No figure on this site is a drawing that was made once and saved. Each one is a function:
it takes parameters and returns SVG, so the same generator produces the p4 plate and the
p6m plate without either being redrawn.
That is the reason the collection can keep growing without the illustrations drifting apart.
A generator is written once, checked once, and every essay that calls it inherits the same
line weights, the same colour roles, and the same behaviour in dark mode. There are
19 of them so far.
cell-shapes
Every projection in the library, measured against both properties Maximum angular deformation across the bottom, maximum areal error up the side, both on logarithmic scales and both measured over several hundred sample points rather than taken from the projection's description. Conformal projections lie on the left edge, equal-area ones along the bottom, and the corner where both vanish is empty because a projection there would be an isometry of the sphere onto the plane. 10⁻⁶ 10⁻⁴ 10⁻² 1 100 10⁻¹¹ 10⁻⁸ 10⁻⁵ 10⁻² 10 10000 maximum angular deformation / degrees maximum areal error nothing here, ever Mercator Stereographic Web Mercator Gall–Peters Mollweide Equirectangular tolerances: 0.0001° and 0.000001 21 projections measured
curvature-field
developable
distortion-compare
distortion-profile
excess-chart
What a constant compass bearing costs The extra distance of the rhumb line over the great circle, for five journeys. It runs from almost nothing on a nearly north–south route to 28 per cent on a high-latitude east–west one. Every number is computed from the two distance formulae rather than quoted. Cape Town – London +0.0% 3 km New York – Madrid +3.0% 171 km Sydney – Santiago +12.7% 1437 km London – Tokyo +18.2% 1737 km Anchorage – London +28.2% 2031 km extra distance over the shortest route great circle vs rhumb line computed, not quoted
family-table
Construction against property Every projection in the library, sorted by the shape it was notionally rolled from and by what it actually preserves. The families do not line up with the properties: cylindrical and pseudocylindrical and pseudoazimuthal and azimuthal and conic each contain projections of more than one kind, which is why the cylindrical–conic–azimuthal taxonomy answers a question nobody has. conformal equal-area compromise claim fails cylindrical Mercator Mercator Lambert Gall–Peters Behrmann Equirectangular Miller Web pseudocylindrical Sinusoidal Mollweide Eckert Robinson pseudoazimuthal Hammer Winkel azimuthal Stereographic Lambert Orthographic Gnomonic Azimuthal conic Lambert Albers rows: how it is built columns: what it preserves
indicatrix-compare
indicatrix-detail
indicatrix-map
inflation-chart
projection-grid
projection-map
route-map
route-projections
standard-parallel
surface-curvature
world-cells