Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Figure

A cylinder unrolls exactly; a sphere does not

Drawn here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it.
A cylinder unrolls exactly; a sphere does not. Both pictures show the same grid. On the left it is wrapped round a cylinder of radius 1, on the right it is laid flat, and every distance in the grid is the same in both — the circumference is 2π and so is the width of the rectangle, checked to 10⁻⁹. This is possible because a cylinder has zero Gaussian curvature. No corresponding picture exists for a sphere.

Both pictures show the same grid. On the left it is wrapped round a cylinder of radius 1, on the right it is laid flat, and every distance in the grid is the same in both — the circumference is 2π and so is the width of the rectangle, checked to 10⁻⁹. This is possible because a cylinder has zero Gaussian curvature. No corresponding picture exists for a sphere.

It is drawn by curvature-figure with show: "developable" — one member of a family of 29 figures that share a generator, so the drawing above is what that generator returns when it is asked for this one and given nothing else.

5 essays call it. Every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this changes every one of these figures.

Six surfaces and their Gaussian curvature. Curvature computed at the centre of each surface, by both available routes — from the way the surface sits in space, and from distances measured inside it alone. The two agree, which is Gauss's theorem. A surface with K = 0 can be unrolled flat without stretching: here the plane, the cylinder and the cone do, and the sphere, the torus and the pseudosphere do not. The impossibility

No map is faithful

Not "no map yet", and not "no map at page size". Gaussian curvature can be computed from inside a surface, a sphere has some and a plane has none, and that closes the question permanently.

 A cylinder unrolls exactly; a sphere does not. Both pictures show the same grid. On the left it is wrapped round a cylinder of radius 1, on the right it is laid flat, and every distance in the grid is the same in both — the circumference is 2π and so is the width of the rectangle, checked to 10⁻⁹. This is possible because a cylinder has zero Gaussian curvature. No corresponding picture exists for a sphere. The impossibility

What can be unrolled

A cylinder is obviously curved and is intrinsically flat, so it lays out on a table with nothing stretched. A sphere is not. The distinction is exactly zero Gaussian curvature, and it is why paper tubes exist and paper globes do not.

 The angles of a triangle, and the curvature inside it. A triangle on the sphere with sides that are great-circle arcs. Its three angles sum to 212.26°, overshooting the flat 180° by 32.26°. Integrating the curvature over the interior gives 0.56306 against an excess of 0.56306 — the same number by two routes that share no arithmetic. That is Gauss–Bonnet, and it is how a flatlander measures the curvature of a world it cannot step outside. The impossibility

Measuring curvature from inside

A flatlander with a ruler can find out that its world is round, by drawing a triangle and adding the angles. Gauss–Bonnet turns that into an exact statement, and the total curvature of a closed surface turns out to be a number obtained by counting.

 One length, three corrugations. A straight segment shortened by a factor of 0.9, then wiggled across its own direction until its length is back to what it was. The wiggle's amplitude is what buys the length and the number of wiggles is free, so all three curves have exactly the target length while the third stays 16 times closer to the shortened segment than the first. That is the mechanism: the family converges to a map that is not isometric, while every member of it is. The impossibility

Impossible in two derivatives, possible in one

The impossibility this whole collection rests on computes a second derivative, so it is a statement about maps that have two. Take one away and it is false: a corrugation restores an exact length while converging to the map that does not, and iterating it gives a flattening whose derivative converges and whose curvature runs to half a million.

 One construction, one number. A ray from a point on the equatorial plane, through the sphere, onto a tangent cylinder. Where the centre sits is the whole of the family: on the axis it gives tan φ, at the far side of the sphere 2 tan(φ/2), and at infinity sin φ. The same expression with angular distance in place of latitude, and a tangent plane in place of a cylinder, gives the gnomonic, the stereographic and the orthographic. The surface decides whether the answer is read as a height or as a radius and nothing else. The families

The developable surface was never necessary

Eight essays on this ladder start from cylinders, cones and planes, and none of them has asked which named projection is actually a projection onto one. Fitting a one-parameter perspective construction to eleven of them: six come back exact, and the three landmarks are the gnomonic at h = 0, the stereographic at h = 1 and the orthographic at h = ∞.

The whole library