Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Figure

A published coordinate is a definition being quoted

Drawn here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it.
A published coordinate is a definition being quoted. Re-observing a control point perfectly, with an instrument good to 20 mm, and comparing the answer to what is published for it. The published coordinate was fixed on a datum realisation that has since been superseded, which accounts for 106 m, and the ground it marks has moved 750 mm in 30 years at 25 mm a year. Both numbers are larger than the observation and neither is an error in it: subtracting a published coordinate from an observed one measures the interval between two definitions.

Re-observing a control point perfectly, with an instrument good to 20 mm, and comparing the answer to what is published for it. The published coordinate was fixed on a datum realisation that has since been superseded, which accounts for 106 m, and the ground it marks has moved 750 mm in 30 years at 25 mm a year. Both numbers are larger than the observation and neither is an error in it: subtracting a published coordinate from an observed one measures the interval between two definitions.

It is drawn by survey-figure with show: "published-against-observed" — one member of a family of 16 figures that share a generator, so the drawing above is what that generator returns when it is asked for this one and given nothing else.

4 essays call it. Every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this changes every one of these figures.

A closed traverse cannot see a scale error. The same closed figure with two different errors in it. On the left every leg is 400 parts per million too long, which is roughly what forgetting the grid scale factor costs — and the figure closes to 2.3e-13 m, which is the last bit of a double rather than a measurement. Scaling every leg of a closed figure by the same factor produces a similar figure and a similar figure is still closed, so the check every specification leans on is blind to it. Every dimension in that figure is wrong: the perimeter is out by 1.17 m. On the right one angle is 20 seconds out — a far smaller disturbance in its own units — and the figure fails to close by 0.062 m. Closure tests the shape and says nothing about the size. Grids, and what a survey does

A traverse must close

The check every survey specification leans on cannot see the error this whole field is about. Scale every leg of a closed figure by four hundred parts per million and it closes to the last bit of a double, while every dimension in it is wrong.

 Only one of a grid's five parameters changes the map. The same ground point written on the British National Grid and on UTM zone 31N, with the difference between the two coordinate pairs taken apart. The largest term by four orders of magnitude is where the two grids put zero — 5544 km, being a different central meridian, a different true origin and different false constants, all of which move every coordinate and no distance. The datum, which is the term everybody names, moves the ground 106 m. And the whole geometric difference between two transverse Mercators is their scale factors — 0.9996012717 against 0.9996 — which at this point is 50 cm. Four of a grid's five parameters are bookkeeping; the fifth is the map. Grids, and what a survey does

Two grids over the same ground

One point in the English Midlands is 406,788 east on the British grid and 167,478 east on UTM. Separating the difference properly leaves a surprise — only one of a grid's five parameters changes the map, and it is not any of the four that dominate the number.

 A published coordinate is a definition being quoted. Re-observing a control point perfectly, with an instrument good to 20 mm, and comparing the answer to what is published for it. The published coordinate was fixed on a datum realisation that has since been superseded, which accounts for 106 m, and the ground it marks has moved 750 mm in 30 years at 25 mm a year. Both numbers are larger than the observation and neither is an error in it: subtracting a published coordinate from an observed one measures the interval between two definitions. Grids, and what a survey does

A published coordinate is a result

Re-observe a control mark perfectly, with an instrument good to twenty millimetres, and the answer disagrees with the published value by a hundred metres. Neither number is wrong. The difference measures the interval between two definitions.

 Two routes to one grid distance, 76.7 kilometres apart. The first four bars are the tape's chain: the chord between two marks, the height difference taken off it, the reduction to the ellipsoid, and the projection's own scale applied. The last is the satellite route — project both marks and subtract — which needs none of those steps because the observation already contains the positions the chain exists to supply. They agree to 0.17 millimetres, and that agreement is what makes the chain checkable at all: two routes to one number, sharing no arithmetic. Grids, and what a survey does

The chain the satellite does not have

The four-step reduction from a tape reading to a grid coordinate exists because a tape does not know where it is. A satellite observation does, so the same distance can be got by projecting both ends and subtracting — and the two answers agreeing to a fifth of a millimetre is the first check the chain has ever had.

The whole library