Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Theme

The thread: Measured, not named

A projection is usually called conformal because that is its name. Here it is called conformal only after the angular deformation has been computed at several hundred points and found to be zero.
10⁻⁶10⁻⁴10⁻²110010⁻¹¹10⁻⁸10⁻⁵10⁻²1010000maximum angular deformation / degreesmaximum areal errornothing here, everMercatorStereographicWeb MercatorGall–PetersMollweideEquirectangulartolerances: 0.0001° and 0.00000121 projections measured What is taught wrongly

Web Mercator is not conformal

It carries almost every map on the internet, it is named after the projection whose entire purpose is preserving angles, and it does not preserve angles. The machinery here found that without being told to look.

 a = 1.74b = 1.74an infinitesimal circle, projectedmeasured at this pointh1.7434scale along the meridiank1.7434scale along the parallela1.7434larger principal scaleb1.7434smaller principal scalea·b3.0396areal scale factorω0.00°maximum angular deformationdashed: undistorteddrawn in Mercator Measuring distortion

Tissot's indicatrix

A tiny circle on the sphere becomes an ellipse on the map, and the ellipse's two axes are the whole story. Almost every published indicatrix is drawn without them, which discards the content and keeps the decoration.

 conformalequal-areacompromiseclaim failscylindricalMercatorMercatorLambertGall–PetersBehrmannEquirectangularMillerWebpseudocylindricalSinusoidalMollweideEckertRobinsonpseudoazimuthalHammerWinkelazimuthalStereographicLambertOrthographicGnomonicAzimuthalconicLambertAlbersrows: how it is builtcolumns: what it preserves The families

Cylinders, cones and planes

The standard taxonomy sorts projections by the shape of paper they were notionally rolled from. It is memorable, it is how everyone is taught, and it says almost nothing about the properties anyone actually chooses on.

 0°20°40°60°80°MercatorGall–PetersWinkelRobinsonlatitudeangular deformationalong a meridian What each projection optimises

Every projection minimises something

A projection is the solution to an optimisation problem, and naming the objective explains more than naming the family. Some objectives are exact constraints, some are least-squares fits, and one is a table of numbers a man adjusted until it looked right.

 New YorkMadridsolid: shortest · dashed: constant bearing+3.0% for the rhumbdrawn in Mercator Paths and directions

Why Mercator exists

A ship can hold a compass bearing and cannot easily hold a great circle. Mercator is the answer to one question — what must a map do so that a constant bearing is a straight line — and it answers it exactly.

 EquirectangularMercatorMollweideSinusoidalRobinsonWinkel tripelsame sphere, same graticuleno two agree What each projection optimises

Which projection is best

An incomplete question, and the incompleteness is the answer. Every projection preserves something and destroys something else, so the comparison worth making is between a projection and a purpose, not between two projections.

 a = 1.08b = 0.92an infinitesimal circle, projectedmeasured at this pointh1.0834scale along the meridiank0.9231scale along the parallela1.0834larger principal scaleb0.9231smaller principal scalea·b1.0000areal scale factorω9.16°maximum angular deformationdashed: undistorteddrawn in Gall–Peters Measuring distortion

What survives a change of coordinates

The scale along the meridian is a property of the map and the grid together. The principal scale factors are a property of the map alone. Only the second kind describes the projection, and the two are routinely quoted as though they were the same thing.

 10⁻⁶10⁻⁴10⁻²110010⁻¹¹10⁻⁸10⁻⁵10⁻²1010000maximum angular deformation / degreesmaximum areal errornothing here, everMercatorStereographicWeb MercatorGall–PetersMollweideEquirectangulartolerances: 0.0001° and 0.00000121 projections measured The impossibility

The trade-off is two lines

Conformal means the two principal scales are equal. Equal-area means their product is one. Both at once forces both to one, which is an isometry, which the curvature forbids. That is the entire argument.

 Mercatorgreat circle bows 3.7e-1Gnomonicgreat circle bows not at allEquirectangulargreat circle bows 2.0e-1Orthographicgreat circle bows 9.0e-2solid: shortest · dashed: constant bearingone pair of routes Paths and directions

The gnomonic companion

One projection turns every great circle into a straight line, and it is the only one that does. It shows less than half the sphere, distorts enormously, and was indispensable for three centuries because of that single exact property.

 Mercator5.62× areaGall–Peters1.00× areaMollweide1.00× areaEquirectangular2.36× areathe cell at 60°scaled to fit, areas as stated What is taught wrongly

The projection that shows true size

There is no such thing, and the phrase hides a real question. Equal-area projections preserve area and destroy shape; nothing preserves size in the sense the phrase implies; and the tools that make the point best are not maps at all.

 10⁻⁶10⁻⁴10⁻²110010⁻¹¹10⁻⁸10⁻⁵10⁻²1010000maximum angular deformation / degreesmaximum areal errornothing here, everMercatorStereographicWeb MercatorGall–PetersMollweideEquirectangulartolerances: 0.0001° and 0.00000121 projections measured Measuring distortion

Measuring instead of naming

A projection is called conformal because that is its name. Running the definition as a computation over several hundred points takes about twenty lines, catches a projection the whole internet uses, and is almost never done.

All themes