Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Figure

A level surface 1000 metres up, from equator to pole

Drawn here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it.
A level surface 1000 metres up, from equator to pole. A quarter of a meridian, with the ellipsoid and one surface of constant potential drawn on it. The surface is 1000.0 metres above the ellipsoid at the equator and 994.7 at the pole: it converges by 5.28 metres, which is 5.28 parts per thousand — the gravity flattening f*, to within second-order terms. The separation is drawn 400× life size; the ellipsoid's own flattening is not exaggerated and is a quarter of a pixel at this scale.

A quarter of a meridian, with the ellipsoid and one surface of constant potential drawn on it. The surface is 1000.0 metres above the ellipsoid at the equator and 994.7 at the pole: it converges by 5.28 metres, which is 5.28 parts per thousand — the gravity flattening f*, to within second-order terms. The separation is drawn 400× life size; the ellipsoid's own flattening is not exaggerated and is a quarter of a pixel at this scale.

It is drawn by height-figure with show: "level-surfaces" — one member of a family of 8 figures that share a generator, so the drawing above is what that generator returns when it is asked for this one and given nothing else.

9 essays call it. Every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this changes every one of these figures.

Three surfaces, and the two heights between them. The ellipsoid, the geoid and the ground, with the two heights a coordinate can carry. Ellipsoidal height h is what a satellite fix returns and is measured from a surface defined by four constants. Orthometric height H is what a level and a staff measure and is referred to the geoid — the equipotential surface that best fits mean sea level. They differ by the separation N, drawn here as 45 metres because that is a stated input rather than a computed one: a geoid model is a data product with a truncation degree in it, and this site computes rather than downloads. The arithmetic h = H + N is exact whatever N is. What the numbers refer to

Height above what?

A satellite reports a height above a mathematical surface. A level and a staff report a height above the surface water settles on. The two disagree by tens of metres, both are correct, and only one of them decides which way a pipe drains.

 Normal gravity, derived from four constants. Gravity on the surface of the level ellipsoid, by Somigliana's closed form, for WGS84. Nothing here is measured: a, f, GM and ω go in and the whole curve comes out, rising 5186 milligal — 0.53 per cent — from equator to pole. The two open marks are the published values of equatorial and polar gravity for WGS84, which the derivation reproduces to ten significant figures rather than borrowing. What the numbers refer to

The ellipsoid is a level surface

WGS84 publishes two dozen constants and defines four of them. The other twenty are consequences — polar gravity, the potential of the ellipsoid, the coefficient that dominates the Earth's gravity field — and every one comes back here from a, f, GM and ω to the last digit published.

 Why a levelled height is not a distance. The correction between raw levelling and orthometric height, for lines at 200, 500, 1000, 2000 metres above the geoid running north from 50°. It is not instrument error: level surfaces converge towards the pole, so a run that stays on one of them gains height relative to another. A line 2000 metres up reaches 647 millimetres over 400 kilometres. The dashed line is 10 millimetres, which is about what a first-order levelling network closes to over that distance — so this is not a refinement, it is the larger of the two numbers. What the numbers refer to

A levelled height is not a distance

Level surfaces converge towards the poles by five metres in a thousand, so a chain of perfectly executed levelling observations does not sum to a height difference. The correction over four hundred kilometres of northing is larger than the network's own closure.

 The same coordinate on four datums. One pair of numbers — 2.0° west, 54.5° north — read as a coordinate on OSGB36, ED50, NAD27 and on WGS84, and plotted where each reading puts the mark on the ground. The spread runs to 195 metres, and the height changes by 51, 44, 47 metres, which is the component nobody quotes. What the numbers refer to

The third coordinate moves too

A datum shift is quoted as a horizontal displacement because horizontal is what people look at. The transformation acts on a three-dimensional point, and its vertical component is between a quarter and a half of the horizontal one — 51 metres, for a British coordinate.

 Clairaut's theorem, and the term it drops. Clairaut's theorem says the flattening of a rotating body plus the flattening of the gravity on it equals five halves of the ratio of centrifugal to gravitational acceleration at the equator. Measured on WGS84: f = 3.3528e-3, f* = 5.3024e-3, and their sum is 8.65525e-3 against the theorem's 8.62447e-3. The residual is 3.08e-5, which is 2.74 times f² — second order, which is what a first-order theorem is entitled to be wrong by. What the numbers refer to

The flattening is not a free parameter

An ellipsoid is usually presented as two numbers somebody fitted. One of them is not free — Clairaut's theorem relates the shape of a rotating body to the gravity on it, and the relation holds on WGS84 with a residual of 3.1×10⁻⁵ — which is 2.74 times f², exactly what a first-order theorem is entitled to.

 One level surface, 1000 m up at the equator, in two height systems. A single equipotential surface — the shape a body of water takes — with the number each height system gives it, all the way from the equator to the pole. The orthometric height, which is the distance up the plumb line and therefore a length, falls by 5.28 metres along it, because level surfaces converge polewards. The dynamic height, which is the geopotential number divided by one constant gravity value, is flat to 0.000 millimetres — it is the same number everywhere on the surface, and it is not a distance from anything. What the numbers refer to

A height that is not a length

Level surfaces converge polewards, so the surface a lake sits on is 5.28 metres lower at the pole than at the equator and a height system that reports lengths says a lake runs downhill. The fix reports a number that is constant on the surface and is not a distance from anything: a hundred-metre climb raises it by 99.73 metres at the equator and 100.26 at the pole.

 Shape predicted from field, against shape as published. Clairaut's theorem gives a body's flattening from two numbers of its gravity field: J₂, which is how its mass is arranged, and m = ω²a³/GM, which is how fast it spins. For a body in hydrostatic equilibrium the prediction is the shape, and the diagonal is where such a body sits. Earth is on it to 0.05 per cent — 12 metres at the pole, out of twenty-one kilometres of flattening. Mars is 12.5 per cent off it, which is 2.23 kilometres, and the excess is Tharsis: a body carrying a continent-sized volcanic load is not a fluid figure, so its ellipsoid is not one of its own level surfaces, and its zero of height has to be chosen rather than found. What the numbers refer to

A body with no sea level

On Earth the zero of height is found rather than chosen — water settles onto the equipotential surface by itself. Nowhere else has one, and the difference is measurable: Clairaut's theorem predicts the Earth's flattening from its own gravity field to twelve metres at the pole and misses Mars's by 2.2 kilometres.

 A mass, the geoid it raises, and the plumb lines that lean towards it. A sphere of 5 km radius buried 8 km down, denser than its surroundings by 500 kg per cubic metre — a salt dome, or an ore body. Its mass is 261.8 × 10¹² kg, and outside itself its field is a point mass's exactly, so everything above is a closed form. The geoid rises 22 centimetres over it, drawn at 20,000× the true slope; the plumb line leans by at most 2.21 arcseconds, and it does so 5.7 km to the side rather than above the body, because the deflection is the geoid's SLOPE and a slope is zero at a summit. That is the number this site has been able to relate and unable to compute since its practice phase. What the numbers refer to

A deflection is the slope of a mass

The site has computed the exact relation between a geoid slope and a deflection of the vertical — one arcsecond is 4.85 millimetres in a kilometre — and computed no deflection anywhere, because a deflection is the gradient of a geoid and the geoid is a citation. State a mass instead, and every quantity is a closed form: a salt dome five kilometres across bends the plumb line by 2.21 arcseconds.

 The drift is a straight line in the deflection. The horizontal distance between where a plumb line hangs at the top of a column of rock and where it hangs at the bottom, against the deflection of the vertical the mass produces at the surface. Four heights of column. Every line is straight through the origin: 12.54 mm of drift per arcsecond of deflection over a 4,000 m line, to two parts in ten thousand across a fortyfold range of deflection. Which is what makes the number transferable — the 47 mm the ladder started from was a statement about one buried sphere, and this is a statement about any mass that produces the same deflection. What the numbers refer to

How far the plumb line bends

The previous rung dropped a plumb line down a four-kilometre column of rock beside one buried mass and found it arrived 47 millimetres from the point below the summit. That is a number about that mass. Parameterising by the deflection of the vertical instead — the quantity surveyors actually measure — gives 12.54 mm per arcsecond, exactly linear across a fortyfold range.

The whole library