Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Figure

What each term of the Krüger series is worth, 3° off the central meridian

Drawn here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it.
What each term of the Krüger series is worth, 3° off the central meridian. The worst error of the truncated series against an independently computed reference, in metres, on a logarithmic scale. Each additional term gains between two and three decimal orders, so the fourth-order formula every national grid is written to sits at 1.7e-5 m — far below anything the survey it serves can measure. The projection as specified is exact; the projection as computed is this good.

The worst error of the truncated series against an independently computed reference, in metres, on a logarithmic scale. Each additional term gains between two and three decimal orders, so the fourth-order formula every national grid is written to sits at 1.7e-5 m — far below anything the survey it serves can measure. The projection as specified is exact; the projection as computed is this good.

It is one of 13 figures drawn by the same construction, and the drawing above is this one with nothing changed.

10 essays call it. Every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this changes every one of these figures.

Why there are two latitudes, at 45°. A meridian section of an ellipsoid with the flattening exaggerated 12× — at the true value of 1/298 this outline would be indistinguishable from a circle. Geodetic latitude is the angle the surface normal makes with the equatorial plane; geocentric latitude is the angle the radius makes with it. The two lines meet the plane at different points and the angles differ by 11.55 arcminutes on the real WGS84 ellipsoid, which is about 21 km of ground distance. What is taught wrongly

The Earth is a sphere, and when it is not

Every essay before this one treated the Earth as a ball, and said so. The flattening is one part in three hundred, which is nothing for a distance, everything for a latitude, and exactly enough to make the most-used projection in the world fail the property in its own name.

 Transverse Mercator. The graticule of the Transverse Mercator projection at 30° of longitude and 15° of latitude. the only projection on which a constant compass bearing is a straight line. It is conformal. The families

Transverse Mercator and the series that computes it

The projection most of the world's survey data lives in has no closed form. What every national grid actually computes is a truncated power series in the flattening, and how far it can be trusted is an engineering parameter rather than a property of the projection.

 The sixty zones, each six degrees wide. Every zone is a separate transverse Mercator projection about its own central meridian, so the world is covered by sixty maps rather than one. Zone 31 is picked out, running from 0° to 6° with its axis on 3°. Coordinates do not carry across a zone boundary — a point on either side of one has two entirely different eastings, and nothing in the numbers says which zone they belong to. The families

UTM and the zone system

Sixty separate maps of the world, each six degrees wide, each with a scale factor of 0.9996 chosen so the projection is wrong everywhere and less wrong at the edges. Every constant in the definition is a measured trade rather than a convention.

 What changing the datum alone does to a coordinate. The distance on the ground between a point as read on its national datum and the same numbers read on WGS84, computed through the published seven-parameter transformation. The shifts run from 49 to 166 metres. For comparison, the scale error a UTM zone introduces at its edge is under a metre per kilometre — so the datum, which is usually left unstated, dominates the projection, which is usually argued about. What is taught wrongly

Datum shifts dwarf projection errors

The projection argument is conducted in parts per million and the datum question is answered in hundreds of metres. A coordinate whose datum is unstated is out by more than any projection choice could ever put it, and almost nobody checks.

 Fitting a polynomial to Mollweide, and what each order buys. An affine, a quadratic and a cubic transformation fitted by least squares between the sphere and Mollweide over patches from 8° down to 0.5° radius, centred at 20°E 40°N. Each is a straight line on these axes and its slope is one more than its own degree: 1 → 2.00, 2 → 3.00, 3 → 4.00. That is not a coincidence and it is this ladder's subject: the first thing a model of degree d cannot represent is the term of degree d+1, so the affine model's error is governed by the second derivative — the flexion and skewness measured everywhere else here. Measuring distortion

A local model has an order

Every georeferencing tool fits a polynomial between two coordinate systems and the choice of degree is usually made by counting control points. What it buys is an order of convergence — 2, 3 and 4, measured — and the first term an affine model cannot hold is the second derivative this ladder has spent five essays on.

 What a solved map is, as a list of numbers. A map with no formula is a list of coefficients, and this is the list. The Chebyshev map of an elongated region, 30° by 10° has its coefficients falling by a factor of 1.5e+13 from the first to the fourteenth, so a table of a dozen numbers carries the whole projection; the conformal cube face's coefficients, marked separately, fall far more slowly because the map has a singularity at each corner. How fast this line falls is exactly how portable the map is — and neither map has a name, an inverse in closed form, or a formula anybody could quote. What each projection optimises

A map with no formula

The solved projection has no name, no formula and no closed-form inverse. It is fourteen numbers — and the rate at which those numbers fall away decides whether a map can be shipped at all: geometrically for a smooth region, and like a power for one with corners.

 The boundary of the region the series is the map in. The curve where the transverse coordinate reaches 2.918, which is where the terms stop shrinking. It crosses the equator 83.81° from the central meridian and closes towards the poles, because the same longitude is a smaller transverse coordinate at a higher latitude — the boundary is a curve rather than a meridian. The narrow band beside it is a 3° zone, the width national grids actually use, drawn to the same scale: the practical world sits in about a fiftieth of what the series can reach. Drawn in Mollweide. The families

Where the series stops being the map

The transverse Mercator has no closed form on an ellipsoid, so every national grid computes a truncated series. Asking how many terms it needs has an answer everywhere; asking whether more terms always help has an answer only within 83.81° of the central meridian, and the boundary is computed rather than assumed.

 Going out and coming back, at three orders. A point three degrees from the central meridian, taken forward into the projection and back again with the series truncated at the same order both ways, and the ground distance between where it started and where it returned. The second-order pair is out by a tenth of a metre at some latitudes; the third by half a millimetre; the fourth — the order every national grid formula in ordinary use is written to — by 0.39 mm. The dips are where one of the two series passes through a node, not where the map is better. The families

The inverse of the series is not the series of the inverse

Transverse Mercator on an ellipsoid has no closed form, so every national grid computes it as a truncated series. There are two of them — one out and one back — and they are separate approximations. Composing them does not give the identity: at the order every grid formula in ordinary use is written to, a point three degrees from the central meridian comes back 0.39 mm north of where it started.

 Two expansions of one integral. The worst error along the whole meridian, against the number of sine terms kept, for the series in the third flattening and the classical series in e². Both are checked against a Simpson's rule on the defining integral, which shares no algebra with either. At one and two terms they are the same number to four digits and the e² series is fractionally ahead; from the third term the n series pulls away, and at four it is 1175 times more accurate — 7.6e-8 metres against 9.0e-5. What is taught wrongly

Which small quantity the series is in

Every ellipsoidal formula in this collection is a truncated series in the third flattening, inherited from Krüger in 1912 and justified nowhere. Measured against the classical expansion in e², at four sine terms it is 1,175 times more accurate — and at one and two terms it is fractionally worse, which is not what the folklore implies.

 Three budgets for one meridian distance, seven orders of magnitude apart. Every quantity that can make a computed distance from the equator to the pole wrong, on a scale of powers of ten. The series in the third flattening, at its worst anywhere on the meridian, is out by 76 nm at four sine terms, 31 µm at three and 22.0 mm at two. The two conventions WGS84 and GRS80 put the pole 82 µm apart. The ellipsoid that best fits the Earth is known only to 15.7 cm from its axis and 563 µm from its flattening, and WGS84 puts the pole 67.2 cm away from it. What is taught wrongly

An ellipsoid computed to a nanometre is known to a decimetre

The meridian series is exact to seventy-six nanometres on WGS84, and WGS84 is exact by definition: its axis and flattening are conventions with no uncertainty at all. The ellipsoid that actually fits the Earth is a measurement, known to sixteen centimetres from equator to pole, and WGS84 puts the pole sixty-seven centimetres away from it. From its second term, the series is more accurate than anything it is used to compute.

The whole library