Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Figure

Two conventions, and neither of them finds the blunder

Drawn here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it.
Two conventions, and neither of them finds the blunder. A blunder of 350 mm added to leg 3 of a closed traverse, producing a misclosure of 350 mm — one part in 8344, which most specifications would accept. Bowditch's rule shares the misclosure out in proportion to leg length; the Transit rule shares it in proportion to each leg's component along the axis being corrected. Both close the figure exactly, so both are valid; they disagree with each other by up to 14 mm; and neither puts more than 104 mm of correction on the leg that is actually wrong. A rule for distributing a misclosure is a convention for producing consistent numbers, and it is not an instrument for finding errors.

A blunder of 350 mm added to leg 3 of a closed traverse, producing a misclosure of 350 mm — one part in 8344, which most specifications would accept. Bowditch's rule shares the misclosure out in proportion to leg length; the Transit rule shares it in proportion to each leg's component along the axis being corrected. Both close the figure exactly, so both are valid; they disagree with each other by up to 14 mm; and neither puts more than 104 mm of correction on the leg that is actually wrong. A rule for distributing a misclosure is a convention for producing consistent numbers, and it is not an instrument for finding errors.

It is drawn by survey-figure with show: "two-conventions" — one member of a family of 16 figures that share a generator, so the drawing above is what that generator returns when it is asked for this one and given nothing else.

6 essays call it. Every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this changes every one of these figures.

Two feet, and the one that is not a rounding. The US survey foot is 1200/3937 m and the international foot is exactly 0.3048 m, so the first is longer by 2.0000 parts per million. Read a coordinate in the wrong one and the error is proportional to the coordinate, not to any distance in the job: at 2.5 million feet from the false origin it reaches 1.52 m, and it crosses a survey's own closing tolerance of twenty millimetres at 33 thousand feet. Across a 300-foot site the same mistake changes every dimension by 0.18 mm — below every tolerance there is, which is why a plan in the wrong foot passes every check and is in the wrong place. Grids, and what a survey does

The units are part of the coordinate

Two feet were in use in the United States until 2022, differing by exactly two parts per million. A plan drawn in the wrong one has every dimension right to a fifth of a millimetre and sits three-quarters of a metre from where it belongs, which is why it passes every check anybody runs.

 A grid scaled to the ground, and where it stops being one. A surface coordinate system on the British National Grid: the grid multiplied by 1.0004044, the reciprocal of the combined factor at a project origin 120 m above the ellipsoid, so that a grid distance equals a ground distance there. It is exact at the origin by construction and wrong everywhere else, and the two directions are not comparable — the axis is logarithmic across five decades. 60 km due east the set-out distance is out by 5559 mm, and the same distance due north by 20.5 mm. The scale factor of a transverse Mercator depends on the easting and almost not at all on the northing, so a system sold as good "within a few kilometres" has a useful area that is a strip rather than a circle. Grids, and what a survey does

A grid scaled to the ground is not a map

Construction sites work in coordinates where a tape reading equals a computed distance, which is achieved by multiplying the national grid by a constant. The result is exact at one point, degrades east–west forty times faster than north–south, and is not a map projection at all.

 A closed traverse cannot see a scale error. The same closed figure with two different errors in it. On the left every leg is 400 parts per million too long, which is roughly what forgetting the grid scale factor costs — and the figure closes to 2.3e-13 m, which is the last bit of a double rather than a measurement. Scaling every leg of a closed figure by the same factor produces a similar figure and a similar figure is still closed, so the check every specification leans on is blind to it. Every dimension in that figure is wrong: the perimeter is out by 1.17 m. On the right one angle is 20 seconds out — a far smaller disturbance in its own units — and the figure fails to close by 0.062 m. Closure tests the shape and says nothing about the size. Grids, and what a survey does

A traverse must close

The check every survey specification leans on cannot see the error this whole field is about. Scale every leg of a closed figure by four hundred parts per million and it closes to the last bit of a double, while every dimension in it is wrong.

 Two conventions, and neither of them finds the blunder. A blunder of 350 mm added to leg 3 of a closed traverse, producing a misclosure of 350 mm — one part in 8344, which most specifications would accept. Bowditch's rule shares the misclosure out in proportion to leg length; the Transit rule shares it in proportion to each leg's component along the axis being corrected. Both close the figure exactly, so both are valid; they disagree with each other by up to 14 mm; and neither puts more than 104 mm of correction on the leg that is actually wrong. A rule for distributing a misclosure is a convention for producing consistent numbers, and it is not an instrument for finding errors. Grids, and what a survey does

The two ways to spread a misclosure

Bowditch's rule and the Transit rule take the same closed figure and the same misclosure and disagree about which legs were wrong. Both close it exactly, neither puts the correction on the leg that actually carries the blunder, and no measurement can settle which is right.

 A published coordinate is a definition being quoted. Re-observing a control point perfectly, with an instrument good to 20 mm, and comparing the answer to what is published for it. The published coordinate was fixed on a datum realisation that has since been superseded, which accounts for 106 m, and the ground it marks has moved 750 mm in 30 years at 25 mm a year. Both numbers are larger than the observation and neither is an error in it: subtracting a published coordinate from an observed one measures the interval between two definitions. Grids, and what a survey does

A published coordinate is a result

Re-observe a control mark perfectly, with an instrument good to twenty millimetres, and the answer disagrees with the published value by a hundred metres. Neither number is wrong. The difference measures the interval between two definitions.

 What a 20 mm closure tolerance lets each station hide. A closed traverse of seven stations in plan, each labelled with the angle blunder that would leave the closure inside a 20 millimetre tolerance. An angle error at a station rotates everything downstream of it about that station, so the closing point moves by the distance from the station to the close — and the last station before the close stands 72 metres from it and can hide 57 arcseconds, against 2.1 at the worst-placed station. The check is not insensitive; it is unevenly sensitive, and nothing in the specification says so. Grids, and what a survey does

What a closed figure cannot see

A closed traverse imposes exactly two conditions on its observations, so everything else is free — and the freedom is not spread evenly. At a twenty-millimetre tolerance the worst-placed station in a seven-station loop hides an angle blunder of 2.1 arcseconds and the station standing seventy-two metres from the close hides 57, because a rotation about a point near the finish moves the finish hardly at all.

The whole library