Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Concept

Central meridian — where it appears

The line of longitude a projection is centred on and along which, for a transverse Mercator grid, the scale factor is fixed by statute. Everything a national grid does — its zone width, its scale factor, its false origin — is stated relative to it.

Named by 13 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A false origin moves every number and no geometry. British National Grid, drawn twice at the same scale. On the left the coordinates are measured from the projection's own origin, where the central meridian meets the true origin's parallel, and 52% of the country takes a negative easting or northing — the worst reaching -323 km. On the right the authority's published false origin of 400 km east and -100 km north has been applied, and none of them does. Every distance computed from the two sets of numbers agrees to the last bit a double has left after carrying six figures, and every bearing agrees exactly; the only thing that changed is that no coordinate carries a sign. The margins say the origin was fitted to the land rather than placed arbitrarily below it: 77 km spare in the west and 50 m in the south, on a grid 988 km tall.

A grid has an origin that is not there

Every published national grid measures from a point in the sea. The British one sits 400 kilometres west and 100 kilometres south of where the projection's own zero is, and moving it changes every coordinate in the country and not one distance or bearing.

practice · Grid Only one of a grid's five parameters changes the map. The same ground point written on the British National Grid and on UTM zone 31N, with the difference between the two coordinate pairs taken apart. The largest term by four orders of magnitude is where the two grids put zero — 5544 km, being a different central meridian, a different true origin and different false constants, all of which move every coordinate and no distance. The datum, which is the term everybody names, moves the ground 106 m. And the whole geometric difference between two transverse Mercators is their scale factors — 0.9996012717 against 0.9996 — which at this point is 50 cm. Four of a grid's five parameters are bookkeeping; the fifth is the map.

What a grid is made of

A projected coordinate declares five things — a datum, a projection, its parameters, a unit and an axis order — and four of them are invisible in the numbers. Every one has a documented case of being guessed wrong, and the cheapest of those cost a hundred metres.

practice · Grid A scale factor is a property of a point, and a distance is not. The grid scale factor sampled along a 362 km line on the British National Grid at a bearing of 90°, with the three rules in use drawn as the constants they replace it by. In a transverse Mercator k depends on the easting almost alone and goes as its square, so along an east–west line the curve is very nearly a parabola. The endpoint mean is the chord across it and lands 268.6 ppm high, which is 97.3 m over this line. Simpson's rule integrates a parabola exactly and lands 0.004 ppm out — 1.3 mm. Neither number is about the line's length.

The scale factor of a line

A scale factor is a property of a point and a distance is not measured at a point. The three rules in use for averaging one along a line differ by a hundred metres on a 362-kilometre baseline, and which of them is adequate is decided by the line's direction rather than its length.

practice · Grid The scale factor was chosen, and the choice is a V. The worst departure of the grid scale factor from unity across a region 9° wide and 9° tall, for every scale factor between 0.998108 and 1.0002, on a central meridian of 2°W. A tangent projection touches at one meridian and is too big everywhere else, at 1987 ppm. Scaling the whole grid down slides that interval until it straddles unity, and the minimum sits at 1/√k_max = 0.999008102, where the worst departure is 993 ppm — a factor of 2.00, which is the most this construction can buy and is reached exactly. The published value marked beside it was chosen the same way, for this region, in the 1930s.

The scale factor was chosen

A grid's scale factor is not a constant of nature. Britain's 0.9996012717 is the reciprocal square root of the worst distortion a tangent projection would have had over the country, it halves the worst-case error exactly, and the halving is the most that construction can ever buy.

practice · Grid What a grid of one's own is worth. For every candidate central meridian, the best worst-case distortion achievable over the region once the scale factor has also been optimised — so each point on the curve is already the bottom of its own V. The minimum is at 2.9°W with k₀ = 0.9993009, giving 700 ppm. The dashed line is UTM zone 30, whose meridian and scale factor were chosen for no region in particular, at 1059 ppm. The national grid is better by a factor of 1.51 — which is the whole of the answer to why a country publishes a grid rather than using the zones, and it is a smaller factor than the argument is usually made to sound.

Designing a grid for one region

A country with a grid of its own beats the international zone that would otherwise carry it by a factor of 1.51. That is worth having and it is much less than the argument is usually made to sound, and the difference between the two numbers is the whole case for and against national grids.

practice · Grid Both zones are right, and one of each is not. A 20 km baseline straddling the boundary between UTM zones 31 and 32 at 52°N, computed from grid coordinates three ways, on logarithmic bars. Taking both ends in zone 31 and taking both in zone 32 give answers 0 nanometres apart — the resolution a double has left after carrying a six-figure easting rather than a disagreement — so a job may use either and the overlap belt every zone publishes exists to let it. Taking each end from the zone it nominally belongs to gives 392 km, because the two eastings are measured from meridians six degrees apart and subtracting them measures nothing at all. The same ground point is 706 km east in one zone and 294 km east in the other, and both coordinates are correct.

Where two zones meet

A twenty-kilometre baseline across a zone boundary is computed correctly in either zone — the two answers differ by nanometres — and taking one end from each returns 392 kilometres. Both zones are right and the seam between them is not a small error but a category one.

practice · Grid Only one of a grid's five parameters changes the map. The same ground point written on the British National Grid and on UTM zone 31N, with the difference between the two coordinate pairs taken apart. The largest term by four orders of magnitude is where the two grids put zero — 5544 km, being a different central meridian, a different true origin and different false constants, all of which move every coordinate and no distance. The datum, which is the term everybody names, moves the ground 106 m. And the whole geometric difference between two transverse Mercators is their scale factors — 0.9996012717 against 0.9996 — which at this point is 50 cm. Four of a grid's five parameters are bookkeeping; the fifth is the map.

Two grids over the same ground

One point in the English Midlands is 406,788 east on the British grid and 167,478 east on UTM. Separating the difference properly leaves a surprise — only one of a grid's five parameters changes the map, and it is not any of the four that dominate the number.

practice · Reduction The scale spread of every grid Britain could have adopted. A grid is conformal by requirement, so its angular deformation is zero everywhere and the whole design problem is the spread of its one remaining number: the largest scale factor over the region divided by the smallest, in parts per million. The grid's own scale factor does not enter — multiplying every scale by a constant leaves the ratio alone, which is why it is chosen last. The bottom bar is Chebyshev's optimum, the conformal map of this region whose scale is constant on its boundary, which no map of any family can beat; the adopted grid sits 1.98 times above it. Measured over a stated box rather than a coastline, because a coastline would put the vendor's generalisation into the answer.

The best grid a country could have had

A national grid is a conformal map chosen for one region, so its whole design problem is one number: the spread of its scale factor. That number has a theoretical floor, this site can now compute it, and the adopted grid turns out to be either exactly optimal or half as good again — depending entirely on which box the country is declared to be.

practice · Grid The widest zone a tolerance of 690 parts per million allows. At each latitude, the half-width at which a transverse Mercator grid with its scale factor rebalanced for that width reaches 690 ppm at its worst point. That tolerance is the one UTM actually meets at the equator, so the curve passes through UTM's own 3° there — and rises to 37.0° at 85° north, because a degree of longitude covers cos φ of the ground and the scale error goes as the square of the ground width. Six degrees is the answer at one latitude.

Sixty zones was a decision about one latitude

Twelve rungs price a grid, a zone, an origin and a reference, and every one of them works inside a single zone. The number of zones has never been asked about: six degrees meets its tolerance at the equator and is loose everywhere else, so a system spending the same tolerance evenly would use 51 zones at the equator and 8 at 82° — and UTM's worst error is 981 parts per million, not the 400 always quoted.

practice · Grid One meridian, two datums, and the ground between them. "the meridian line of the 141st degree of west longitude" — Anglo-Russian Convention, 1825. The line whose longitude is exactly 141° west, drawn twice: once on nad27 and once on WGS84, with the east–west separation exaggerated 3,000 times. The two are 129.0 metres apart, and remarkably constant — the shift changes by five centimetres over nine degrees of latitude — so the strip between them is a ribbon 129 metres wide and 1039 kilometres long, which is 134.0 square kilometres. The sentence has not changed. The surface the number refers to has.

A meridian boundary moves when its datum does

The 141st meridian is the one boundary description in this collection with no geometric ambiguity in it: every reading of it is the same curve, exactly. It has a different one. A longitude refers to a datum, the 1825 convention named none, and the line of longitude exactly 141° west sits 129.0 metres apart on NAD27 and WGS84 — a ribbon 1,039 kilometres long and 134 square kilometres in area.

practice · Boundary Goode's lobes and the lobes the land would choose, at his own count of two north and four south. The land in two-degree cells, Antarctica pale because it is not scored, with Goode's cuts dashed and the land's own solid; a short tick at the equator marks each lobe's central meridian. Goode's: edge at 180°, northern cut at 40°W, southern cuts at 100°W, 20°W and 80°E, meridians 100°W and 30°E north and 160°W, 60°W, 20°E, 140°E south — 16.51° of mean angular deformation on the land outside Antarctica. The land's, with no cut crossing more land than Goode's worst: edge at 20°W, northern cut at 165°E, southern cuts at 70°E, 155°E, 175°W, meridians 65°E and 100°W north and 25°E, 135°E, 175°E, 60°W south — 14.48°.

The land would move Goode's lobes before his join

Goode chose his lobes by eye: where the cuts run and where each lobe's meridian sits. Scored on the land outside Antarctica and found exactly on a five-degree grid, the land's own layout at his count of two lobes north and four south deforms it by 14.48° against his 16.51° — two degrees, more than his meridians were worth in the first place — while its cuts cross less land than his: 2,057 kilometres against 2,391, the worst of them 1,056 against the 1,946 his northern cut spends on Greenland. The land wants the map's edge in the Atlantic and its northern cut in the Pacific. His fourth southern lobe is worth four hundredths of a degree, and once the lobes are the land's the best join climbs again, to sixty degrees.

families · Families The lobes the ocean would choose, against the lobes the land chose. The water in two-degree cells, with the land's own layout dashed and the ocean's solid; a short tick at the equator marks each lobe's central meridian. The land's, at two lobes north and four south: edge at 20°W, northern cut at 165°E, southern cuts at 70°E, 135°E, 180° — 14.40° of mean angular deformation on the land outside Antarctica and 19.75° on the water. The ocean's: edge at 40°E, northern cut at 110°W, southern cuts at 135°E, 140°W, 60°W, meridians 175°E and 40°W north and 85°E, 180°, 105°W, 10°W south — 13.31° on the water and 26.18° on the land.

The ocean centres its lobes on the land's cuts, and cannot keep its own cuts short

Run on the water instead of the land, the same exact search gives an interrupted homolosine whose lobes sit on the Pacific, the Atlantic and the Indian Ocean — five of its six central meridians within twenty degrees of a cut the land's own layout chose — and it deforms the water by 13.31° against the 19.75° the land's layout gives it. The inversion stops at the cuts. Every meridian on Earth crosses at least 7,172 kilometres of water, so the ocean's map has no layout whose cuts stay under seven thousand, where the land's went below nine hundred. And no layout serves both: none comes within 2.57° of both optima at once, though a single wide Pacific lobe buys the water 2.8° for a tenth of a degree of land.

families · Families The water moves the join higher than the land does, to seventy-five degrees. Goode's composite joined at each latitude, two lobes north and four south. On the water to 88°, with the layout searched afresh at each join (solid): 14.10° at 25°, 13.87° at 30°, 13.60° at 35°, 13.37° at 40°, 13.31° at 40.7°, 13.14° at 45°, 12.89° at 50°, 12.66° at 55°, 12.52° at 60°, 12.40° at 65°, 12.29° at 70°, 12.27° at 75°, 12.27° at 80°, 12.29° at 85°, 12.30° at 89°; with the ocean's layout found at Goode's join held (dashed), within 0.05° of it everywhere. On the land outside Antarctica, the land's own layout searched at each join: best at 60° with 13.83° against 14.40° at Goode's; the water's best is 75° with 12.27° against 13.31°.

The water would join Goode's map at seventy-five degrees

Goode joined the sinusoidal to the Mollweide at 40° 44′, and the land, given its own lobes, moves that join up to sixty degrees. The water moves it further, to seventy-five, and gains twice as much by it — a full degree of mean angular deformation against the land's half — though less of the northern water than of the northern land lies above Goode's join. The gain is in the polar water, north and south, where Goode's Mollweide cap shears even the lobes' own meridians; the water just above his join, the northern edge of the Southern Ocean among it, pays part of it back. A separate join for each hemisphere is worth a few hundredths of a degree, and with the join free the one-layout-for-both question comes out the same way it did with the join fixed, only worse: no layout comes within 3.3 degrees of both surfaces' best at once.

families · Families

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

National GridScale factorTransverse MercatorUTMToleranceVerificationZoneConventionBoundaryFalse originOptimisationTrade-off

All concepts