Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Concept

Shape distortion — where it appears

The departure of a projection from preserving shape at a point, measured as the maximum angular deformation. It is zero exactly where the map is conformal, and it is the quantity the word *conformal* is a claim about and this collection measures before printing.

Named by 10 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One 20° × 10° cell at 60°, under four projections. The same patch of the sphere, drawn by four projections and scaled to fit. The shapes differ and so do the areas: the figure under each panel is the areal inflation relative to the same cell at the equator, so 1.00 means the projection treats the two fairly.

The projection that shows true size

There is no such thing, and the phrase hides a real question. Equal-area projections preserve area and destroy shape; nothing preserves size in the sense the phrase implies; and the tools that make the point best are not maps at all.

wrong · Audit What a pole line buys, and what it costs. four pseudocylindrical projections placed by the two numbers the decision moves. Across the bottom, the angular deformation averaged over the whole sphere, where the pole-line projections — Eckert IV and Robinson — are the better maps. Up the side, on a log axis, the factor by which the last parallel is stretched, where they are worse by more than tenfold: 49× at best against 4.6× at worst for a pole drawn as a point. A pole line represents one point of the globe by a line of the map, and that is the price.

Where a pseudocylindrical puts its error

Every projection in this family has to decide what to do at the pole, which on the globe is a point where every meridian meets. Drawing it as a point and drawing it as a line are the two answers, and the trade between them is measurable in both directions.

families · Families Which way Sinusoidal stretches the ground. The major axis of Tissot's indicatrix at 180 points, drawn as a stroke rather than an ellipse because the argument is the orientation. Longer strokes mark more elongated indicatrices. The direction departs from the graticule by up to 44.4°, so the scale "along the meridian" is not the scale along the direction that is actually stretched most.

Distortion has a direction

Tissot's indicatrix is an ellipse, an ellipse has an orientation, and the orientation is never reported. On most projections it is not along the meridian, on a conformal one it does not exist at all, and both facts are computable from the same four derivatives as everything else.

distortion · Tissot The same map on four differently prepared pages. Mollweide at 30°E 20°N, then the same projection with a rotation and a magnification applied to the page, then with one axis stretched by 1.6, then with a shear of 0.5. The similarity changes nothing: flexion, skewness, ω and the anisotropy are identical to every printed figure, and only the last column — the same turning measured per unit of page arc rather than per unit of ground arc — moves, by exactly the magnification. The stretch and the shear change all of them, and flexion by 35 per cent.

The second derivative is not an invariant

The first-order ladder established which quantities survive a change of coordinates and which are artefacts of the parameterisation. Asked of the second order, the answer is that flexion survives a rotation and a magnification of the page exactly, and survives nothing else: a stretch of 1.6 in one axis moves it by eleven per cent, a shear of 0.5 by thirty-five, and a shear of 3 leaves a ranking of eight world maps with a rank correlation of −0.07 to the one it started with.

distortion · Flexion A geodesic circle on Mollweide, and the two models of where it goes. A circle of geodesic radius ρ about 20°E 45°N, projected. The dashed outline is where the indicatrix says it goes — the ellipse a Tissot figure draws — and the thin solid one adds the quadratic term, which is the flexion and skewness this ladder measures. At 16° the indicatrix is out by 13.5 per cent of the figure's own size and the second-order model by 2.20 — a factor of 6.16, which is what one more derivative buys.

The size at which the second derivative arrives

Six essays have measured a projection's second derivative at points, over regions and under transformations, and none of them says at what size it stops being a curiosity. The answer needs a figure with an extent rather than a point, and it is smaller than anybody drawing a national map would guess: the indicatrix alone places a shape to one part in a thousand out to thirteen kilometres.

distortion · Flexion Four cities, met — the triangular, x first construction. Every cell drawn here holds the same area of ground and a different area of page: the map has been constructed so that its areal scale factor is the density it was handed, cell by cell, over a contrast of 25.99 to one. The residual against that target is 5.1e-6, measured from the map's own derivatives rather than from the construction. What it cost is the shape: the redistribution alone reaches 139.1° of angular deformation and averages 70.4°, on top of whatever the equal-area projection under it was already doing.

A map drawn to a density it was handed

Two hundred and twenty-six essays measure distortion after the fact. This one specifies it: a density is handed to a map as a boundary condition, the areal scale factor comes out equal to it to five parts in a million, and every other invariant the site owns becomes the price.

distortion · Cartogram Four cartograms of one density. The same stated density — four cities — met four different ways, drawn on the same cells. Every panel is a correct cartogram of the same numbers: a region's page area is proportional to its mass in all four. They do not look alike, because the areal scale factor fixes one number per point and a map has four derivatives, so three degrees of freedom per point are left over and each construction spends them differently.

Every density can be met and none is free

Four maps of the same data, all of them correct, charging between 57.6° and 104.4° of angular deformation for it. There is no such thing as the cartogram of a density — there is an infinite family, and somebody picked a member of it without saying so.

distortion · Cartogram A ruler on a cartogram is not measuring anything. Twelve pairs of places, each measured on the ground and on the page of the triangular, x first cartogram of four cities, with the page scaled so that the median pair reads exactly right — the most generous calibration available. The line is that calibration. The worst pair, Tokyo to Quito, reads 21598 km for a ground distance of 14439 km, an error of 49.6%. The open marks are the same pairs on the equal-area map the cartogram was built from.

Everything else on the page pays for the areas

A cartogram gets one quantity exactly right and every other reading a page supports is collateral. A ruler on it is out by 35 per cent after the most generous calibration available, and ten of sixty triples of places change which one is in the middle.

distortion · Cartogram The same tiling, turned. The cube's eight vertices, ringed, and eight cities, with the aspect of the cell each city falls in written beside it. The two panels are the same tiling: the same cells, the same areas, the same shapes, in the same numbers. Only where they sit has changed, and the eight cities get cells whose areas spread by 1.26 in one and 1.39 in the other. Drawn on Mollweide, in which equal ground areas are equal page areas.

The orientation is a policy

A polyhedral cell system has three free angles nobody scores. They cannot improve it: rotating the solid rotates every cell rigidly, so the distribution of cell areas is identical for every orientation there is. What they decide is who stands on the bad cells — and the eight cities measured here get a spread of cell area of 1.00 under the best turn and 1.50 under the worst.

applied · Cells Six regions, before and after. Six circular regions of unequal size on the equal-area rectangle, and the same six after the cartogram of four cities has been solved. Each drawn area is exactly its base area times the density it was asked for. The four that grow stay recognisably round; the two that shrink are drawn out into shapes that no longer resemble what they were, and nothing in the construction chose to treat them differently.

A cartogram keeps the shapes it inflates

Seven rungs build cartograms and none reads one back. Reading means recognising a region and dividing its drawn area by its base area, and the construction is against the reader twice: the correlation between how much a region grows and how much of its shape it keeps is −0.996, and the base area a reader has to divide by is the map the cartogram replaced.

distortion · Cartogram

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Equal-areaAngular deformationCartogramDensityPrincipal scale factorsAnisotropyAreal factorInvariantPurposeAreaDesignFlexion

All concepts