Theme

The thread: Purpose before property

Asking which projection is best is asking an incomplete question. Every one of them minimises something, and the only useful comparison is between a projection and the job it was chosen for.
10⁻⁶10⁻⁴10⁻²110010⁻¹¹10⁻⁸10⁻⁵10⁻²1010000maximum angular deformation / degreesmaximum areal errornothing here, everMercatorStereographicWeb MercatorGall–PetersMollweideEquirectangulartolerances: 0.0001° and 0.00000121 projections measured What is taught wrongly

Web Mercator is not conformal

It carries almost every map on the internet, it is named after the projection whose entire purpose is preserving angles, and it does not preserve angles. The machinery here found that without being told to look.

LondonTokyosolid: shortest · dashed: constant bearing+18.2% for the rhumbdrawn in Mercator Paths and directions

The shortest route is not straight

The shortest path between two points on a sphere is an arc of a great circle, and on almost every map it is a curve. The straight line on a Mercator chart is a different route entirely, and on some journeys it is twenty-eight per cent longer.

conformalequal-areacompromiseclaim failscylindricalMercatorMercatorLambertGall–PetersBehrmannEquirectangularMillerWebpseudocylindricalSinusoidalMollweideEckertRobinsonpseudoazimuthalHammerWinkelazimuthalStereographicLambertOrthographicGnomonicAzimuthalconicLambertAlbersrows: how it is builtcolumns: what it preserves The families

Cylinders, cones and planes

The standard taxonomy sorts projections by the shape of paper they were notionally rolled from. It is memorable, it is how everyone is taught, and it says almost nothing about the properties anyone actually chooses on.

20°40°60°80°MercatorGall–PetersWinkelRobinsonlatitudeangular deformationalong a meridian What each projection optimises

Every projection minimises something

A projection is the solution to an optimisation problem, and naming the objective explains more than naming the family. Some objectives are exact constraints, some are least-squares fits, and one is a table of numbers a man adjusted until it looked right.

New YorkMadridsolid: shortest · dashed: constant bearing+3.0% for the rhumbdrawn in Mercator Paths and directions

Why Mercator exists

A ship can hold a compass bearing and cannot easily hold a great circle. Mercator is the answer to one question — what must a map do so that a constant bearing is a straight line — and it answers it exactly.

equator23°45°60°70°MercatorEquirectangularMillerGall–Peterslatitude of the cell1× means treated fairlyrelative to the equator What is taught wrongly

Mercator against Peters

The most-argued question in cartography, conducted almost entirely without anyone measuring anything. Both projections are exactly what they claim, each destroys what the other keeps, and the numbers are computable in either direction.

EquirectangularMercatorMollweideSinusoidalRobinsonWinkel tripelsame sphere, same graticuleno two agree What each projection optimises

Which projection is best

An incomplete question, and the incompleteness is the answer. Every projection preserves something and destroys something else, so the comparison worth making is between a projection and a purpose, not between two projections.

20°40°60°80°exact at equatorexact at 30°exact at 45°latitudeangular deformationall three are equal-area The families

What a standard parallel buys

A standard parallel is a line where the projection is exact. Choosing one does not reduce the distortion — it decides where the distortion is zero and lets everything grow away from it.

Mercatorgreat circle bows 3.7e-1Gnomonicgreat circle bows not at allEquirectangulargreat circle bows 2.0e-1Orthographicgreat circle bows 9.0e-2solid: shortest · dashed: constant bearingone pair of routes Paths and directions

The gnomonic companion

One projection turns every great circle into a straight line, and it is the only one that does. It shows less than half the sphere, distorts enormously, and was indispensable for three centuries because of that single exact property.

RobinsonWinkel tripelMollweideMercatorGall–PetersEckert IVsame sphere, same graticuleno two agree What each projection optimises

Compromise projections

A projection that preserves nothing exactly can distort everything less than one that preserves something exactly. For a general-purpose world map that is the right trade, and it is why the two most widely used ones today have no exact property at all.

Orthographicgreat circle bows 9.0e-2Gnomonicgreat circle bows not at allStereographicgreat circle bows 9.3e-2Azimuthal equidistantgreat circle bows 1.5e-1solid: shortest · dashed: constant bearingone pair of routes The families

The aspect is a free choice

A projection's distortion pattern is fixed relative to its own axis, and where that axis points is entirely up to the cartographer. Rotating it is the cheapest available improvement and it is the one most often left unmade.

Mercator5.62× areaGall–Peters1.00× areaMollweide1.00× areaEquirectangular2.36× areathe cell at 60°scaled to fit, areas as stated What is taught wrongly

The projection that shows true size

There is no such thing, and the phrase hides a real question. Equal-area projections preserve area and destroy shape; nothing preserves size in the sense the phrase implies; and the tools that make the point best are not maps at all.

All themes