Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Theme

The thread: Computed, not quoted — page 2

Scale factors, areal ratios, angular deformations, geodesic distances and the areas of countries are all computed while the figure is drawn. None is a number recalled from a table. Essays 25 to 48 of 299.
What 4 parts per million of network strain leaves behind. Each arrow is where the best-fitting seven-parameter transformation leaves a marker, over 36 markers laid out as a grid across OSGB36's ground. The RMS residual is 1.64 metres and the worst is 3.00 metres. Seven parameters span the constant and linear parts of a displacement field; this one is quadratic, so no choice of the seven can reach it. The arrows are drawn 27× life size. What the numbers refer to

Where a fit leaves residuals

Seven parameters can carry a rigid motion and a size exactly. A triangulation network is neither, so the best possible transformation between two datums leaves metres on the table — in a pattern, not as noise — and which seven parameters come out depends on where the markers were.

 London to Tokyo on Orthographic. Two routes. The great circle is 9559 km and is the shortest path on the sphere. The rhumb line holds a single compass bearing the whole way and is 11296 km — 1737 km further, or 18.2 per cent. On Orthographic the rhumb line departs from straight by 2.9e-1 of its own length. Paths and directions

The great-circle vertex

One quantity is constant along a shortest path on a sphere, and it fixes the highest latitude that path will reach before the journey starts. That number is why polar routes exist, and it can be read off the departure bearing without tracing the route at all.

 Every projection in the library, measured against both properties. Maximum angular deformation across the bottom, maximum areal error up the side, both on logarithmic scales and both measured over several hundred sample points rather than taken from the projection's description. Conformal projections lie on the left edge, equal-area ones along the bottom, and the corner where both vanish is empty because a projection there would be an isometry of the sphere onto the plane. All 26 are plotted; the six named here are Mercator, Web Mercator, Gall–Peters, Mollweide, Equirectangular, Stereographic. Measuring distortion

Measuring instead of naming

A projection is called conformal because that is its name. Running the definition as a computation over several hundred points takes about twenty lines, catches a projection the whole internet uses, and is almost never done.

 The least distortion possible over a 30° region. Scale factor along a radius of the cap, each projection normalised to unit scale at the centre. Chebyshev's criterion names the projection whose scale is constant on the boundary as the conformal map of least scale variation, and for a cap that is the stereographic projection centred on it — reaching exactly sec²(ρ/2) = 1.0718 at the rim, marked. Every other conformal projection drawn here rises past that line before it gets there. This is the only figure on the site showing an optimum rather than a comparison. The impossibility

Total curvature and the scale rule

The impossibility has a size. A region covering a fraction of the sphere carries a fixed amount of curvature that any flat map must absorb, and for a circular region the least distortion any conformal projection can achieve is a closed form nobody can beat.

 The sixty zones, each six degrees wide. Every zone is a separate transverse Mercator projection about its own central meridian, so the world is covered by sixty maps rather than one. Zone 31 is picked out, running from 0° to 6° with its axis on 3°. Coordinates do not carry across a zone boundary — a point on either side of one has two entirely different eastings, and nothing in the numbers says which zone they belong to. The families

UTM and the zone system

Sixty separate maps of the world, each six degrees wide, each with a scale factor of 0.9996 chosen so the projection is wrong everywhere and less wrong at the edges. Every constant in the definition is a measured trade rather than a convention.

 One pixel at zoom 11: 76.4 m projected, 47.6 m at 51.5°. The grid squares are pixels, at their own size. The open mark is the stored coordinate and the filled one is where it is drawn: rounding moves it 20.2 metres, against a worst case of 33.6 — half a pixel's diagonal, which is the whole of the bound. The second point sits 43 metres away, 0.58 of a pixel east and 0.70 north, so whether the two are drawn as one dot or two is decided by where the tile grid happens to fall: they merge for 12 per cent of the possible offsets, against the 12 per cent the two fractions predict. What a machine does with it

The pixel is a place with a size

Drawing a coordinate rounds it to a pixel, which moves it by up to half a diagonal — 16.8 metres at zoom 12. Whether two points 43 metres apart appear as two dots is not a property of the data at all: they merge for 12 per cent of the positions the tile grid could take, and the closed form predicts 12.4.

 The angles of a triangle, and the curvature inside it. A triangle on the sphere with sides that are great-circle arcs. Its three angles sum to 212.26°, overshooting the flat 180° by 32.26°. Integrating the curvature over the interior gives 0.56306 against an excess of 0.56306 — the same number by two routes that share no arithmetic. That is Gauss–Bonnet, and it is how a flatlander measures the curvature of a world it cannot step outside. The impossibility

Measuring curvature from inside

A flatlander with a ruler can find out that its world is round, by drawing a triangle and adding the angles. Gauss–Bonnet turns that into an exact statement, and the total curvature of a closed surface turns out to be a number obtained by counting.

 Molodensky against the exact route, NAD27. The distance on the ground between where each shortcut puts the transformed point and where the exact Cartesian route puts it, at 0 metres of ellipsoidal height, on a logarithmic scale. The full formulae stay within 0.8 centimetres across every latitude drawn; the abridged form, which replaces two ellipsoid-difference coefficients with one combined term, is worst at 40 centimetres — a factor of 48. The abridged curve dips near 45°, where the combined coefficient happens to equal the pair it replaces. What the numbers refer to

Molodensky's shortcut

The exact way to shift a datum needs an iteration nobody wanted to run on a 1950s machine, so a direct formula was derived instead. It lands within centimetres — and the abridged version everybody quotes is a different formula, worse by a factor of fifty.

 The least distortion possible over a 20° region. Scale factor along a radius of the cap, each projection normalised to unit scale at the centre. Chebyshev's criterion names the projection whose scale is constant on the boundary as the conformal map of least scale variation, and for a cap that is the stereographic projection centred on it — reaching exactly sec²(ρ/2) = 1.0311 at the rim, marked. Every other conformal projection drawn here rises past that line before it gets there. This is the only figure on the site showing an optimum rather than a comparison. Measuring distortion

Scale distortion is the third failure

A map's stated scale is its scale at one place. Everywhere else it differs, by a factor that no conformal projection can avoid and that neither of the two usual distortion measures reports. It is the failure everybody uses and nobody counts.

 Two feet, and the one that is not a rounding. The US survey foot is 1200/3937 m and the international foot is exactly 0.3048 m, so the first is longer by 2.0000 parts per million. Read a coordinate in the wrong one and the error is proportional to the coordinate, not to any distance in the job: at 2.5 million feet from the false origin it reaches 1.52 m, and it crosses a survey's own closing tolerance of twenty millimetres at 33 thousand feet. Across a 300-foot site the same mistake changes every dimension by 0.18 mm — below every tolerance there is, which is why a plan in the wrong foot passes every check and is in the wrong place. Grids, and what a survey does

The units are part of the coordinate

Two feet were in use in the United States until 2022, differing by exactly two parts per million. A plan drawn in the wrong one has every dimension right to a fifth of a millimetre and sits three-quarters of a metre from where it belongs, which is why it passes every check anybody runs.

 What treating the Earth as a sphere costs, per journey. The ellipsoidal geodesic minus the spherical great circle, in kilometres, for five journeys. The correction is a few tenths of a per cent and it changes sign: a route running east–west at mid latitude is longer on the ellipsoid, and one running along a meridian is shorter, because an oblate body is fatter round the equator and flatter pole to pole. Both distances are computed — Vincenty's iteration against the haversine formula — and the ellipsoidal one is checked against a geodesic obtained by integrating its own differential equation. Paths and directions

Geodesics on the ellipsoid, and why they are hard

The shortest path on a flattened Earth is not a plane curve, has no closed form, and can be longer or shorter than the spherical answer depending on which way it runs. Every practical method is a series or an iteration, and the correction changes sign.

 Sinusoidal, cut into 6 lobes. six lobes, cut through the oceans so each continent stays whole. Each lobe is the same projection about its own central meridian, so each point is near a line where the shape distortion vanishes: the mean angular deformation over the mapped world falls from 38.6° uninterrupted to 17.8° here. What is given up is that the map is no longer one surface — the graticule stops at every cut because there is nothing on the other side of it. What each projection optimises

Giving up continuity

Cutting a map into lobes really does reduce the distortion, by a factor that can be measured. What is paid is that the map stops being one surface — and the size of the tear is the number that pictures of interrupted maps never carry.

 Five latitudes that are not the latitude, on WGS84. Each curve is the amount by which one auxiliary latitude falls below the geodetic latitude a coordinate actually means, in arcminutes. All five vanish at the equator and at the poles and peak near 45°, where the geocentric latitude is 11.55 arcminutes below the geodetic one — about 21.4 km on the ground. The curves never cross, which is forced by the algebra rather than by this ellipsoid's particular flattening. What is taught wrongly

Geodetic against geocentric latitude

Two angles, both called latitude, differing by eleven and a half arcminutes at their worst. One is what every coordinate means and the other is what every spherical formula assumes, and the gap between them is twenty-one kilometres on the ground.

 What grid spacing a tolerance buys. The worst bilinear interpolation error across OSGB36's ground, against the spacing of the table it is interpolated from, both axes logarithmic. The smooth shift falls by exactly four for every halving, which is what second-order interpolation does. Adding a 30 centimetre ripple 2 degrees across — three parts in a thousand of the 99 metre shift it rides on — moves the spacing needed for 20 millimetres from 1° to 0.125°, which is 64 times as many nodes. What the numbers refer to

When a formula is not enough

National mapping agencies distribute datum shifts as tables of numbers on a grid rather than as parameters. What decides the spacing that table needs is not the size of the shift — a hundred-metre shift tabulates coarsely, and a thirty-centimetre ripple riding on it does not.

 Mercator swung through every tilt, over Chile and the tropics. The regional distortion of one projection as its axis is tilted from the normal aspect at 0° to the transverse at 90°, each curve divided by its own value in the normal aspect so the two regions can share an axis. Chile is best at a tilt of 90°, a factor of 183.5 better than north-up; the tropics is best at a tilt of 0°, which is north-up. Rotating the sphere costs nothing and changes none of the projection's own properties, which makes this the cheapest improvement available and the one most often left unmade. What each projection optimises

Fitting the aspect to the region

Choosing a projection is a choice among a few dozen named things. Choosing its aspect is a choice among a continuum, it costs nothing, it changes none of the projection's own properties, and for a long thin country it is worth a factor of 183.

 American polyconic. The graticule of the American polyconic projection at 30° of longitude and 15° of latitude. a different tangent cone for every parallel — true to scale along all of them, and along the central meridian. It is neither conformal nor equal-area. The families

The projections that gave up being one thing

The polyconic is built from a different cone for every parallel, which means it is built from no cone at all. It preserves nothing the usual tests look for, it has an exact property neither of them measures, and its sheets do not fit together — a defect discovered in the field rather than at the drawing board.

 A feature across nine tiles at zoom 4, and the nine labels it gets. A rectangle from -10° to 30° east and 36° to 62° north, drawn in the projected plane with the tile boundaries over it. A renderer that draws each tile from the geometry inside that tile puts the label at the centroid of the piece, marked hollow; the whole feature's centroid is the filled mark. The furthest piece's label is 1863 kilometres from it. The pieces' areas sum to the whole to 2.2e-16 of a relative part, so the clipping is exact and the displacement is the operation rather than an error in it. What a machine does with it

A tile is drawn without its neighbours

Independence is what makes the scheme scale: one request touches one square of the world. It also means a feature crossing nine tiles is nine features, each labelled at its own centroid — up to 1,863 kilometres from the whole one — and the displacement is bounded by the size of the feature rather than the size of a tile, so it grows as the reader zooms out.

 The same six projections, ranked over Europe and Chile. Each column orders the projections by Kavrayskiy's regional criterion — the root-mean-square departure of the two principal scales from unity, integrated over the region with the area element. The lines cross, which is the point: Lambert conformal conic leads over Europe and comes fifth over Chile. A table of projections ordered by distortion is a table about somebody's region. Measuring distortion

Distortion over a region

An indicatrix describes a point and every practical question is about a country. Going from one to the other means integrating, integrating means choosing a weighting, and the weighting is the step that turns a measurement into somebody's opinion.

 Where the inverse problem stops converging, 3° around the antipode of London. Every target in a 6° square centred on the point diametrically opposite London, shaded by how many iterations Vincenty's inverse formula needed to find the geodesic to it. 3 of 625 — 0% — never converged at all, and the worst success took 113 steps against a handful anywhere else on Earth. The failure is not a defect in the formula: near the antipode the shortest path is nearly ambiguous, and an iteration looking for one answer is being asked which of many. Paths and directions

The route with no shortest path

Between a point and the point diametrically opposite there are infinitely many shortest routes and no shortest route, and the standard formula for the distance between two places stops converging in a neighbourhood of it. The failure is a property of the question rather than a defect in the answer.

 What changing the datum alone does to a coordinate. The distance on the ground between a point as read on its national datum and the same numbers read on WGS84, computed through the published seven-parameter transformation. The shifts run from 49 to 166 metres. For comparison, the scale error a UTM zone introduces at its edge is under a metre per kilometre — so the datum, which is usually left unstated, dominates the projection, which is usually argued about. What is taught wrongly

Datum shifts dwarf projection errors

The projection argument is conducted in parts per million and the datum question is answered in hundreds of metres. A coordinate whose datum is unstated is out by more than any projection choice could ever put it, and almost nobody checks.

 What a grid of one's own is worth. For every candidate central meridian, the best worst-case distortion achievable over the region once the scale factor has also been optimised — so each point on the curve is already the bottom of its own V. The minimum is at 2.9°W with k₀ = 0.9993009, giving 700 ppm. The dashed line is UTM zone 30, whose meridian and scale factor were chosen for no region in particular, at 1059 ppm. The national grid is better by a factor of 1.51 — which is the whole of the answer to why a country publishes a grid rather than using the zones, and it is a smaller factor than the argument is usually made to sound. Grids, and what a survey does

Designing a grid for one region

A country with a grid of its own beats the international zone that would otherwise carry it by a factor of 1.51. That is worth having and it is much less than the argument is usually made to sound, and the difference between the two numbers is the whole case for and against national grids.

 How large a patch can be treated as flat, at 10 parts per million. The smallest scale distortion any map of a circular patch can have, against the radius of the patch, on logarithmic axes. The line is straight with a slope of 2.00: the error grows as the SQUARE of the size, so a patch ten times wider is a hundred times worse. A tolerance of 10 ppm is reached at a radius of 40.3 km — 81 km across — and that is the number behind the boundary between plane surveying and geodesy. The impossibility

How small is flat enough

A builder works in plane coordinates and a national mapping agency does not, and the line between them is not a convention. The unavoidable error of treating a patch of the Earth as flat grows as the square of its size, and the size at any stated tolerance is a number.

 Both zones are right, and one of each is not. A 20 km baseline straddling the boundary between UTM zones 31 and 32 at 52°N, computed from grid coordinates three ways, on logarithmic bars. Taking both ends in zone 31 and taking both in zone 32 give answers 0 nanometres apart — the resolution a double has left after carrying a six-figure easting rather than a disagreement — so a job may use either and the overlap belt every zone publishes exists to let it. Taking each end from the zone it nominally belongs to gives 392 km, because the two eastings are measured from meridians six degrees apart and subtracting them measures nothing at all. The same ground point is 706 km east in one zone and 294 km east in the other, and both coordinates are correct. Grids, and what a survey does

Where two zones meet

A twenty-kilometre baseline across a zone boundary is computed correctly in either zone — the two answers differ by nanometres — and taking one end from each returns 392 kilometres. Both zones are right and the seam between them is not a small error but a category one.

 How Equirectangular distorts, by latitude. Angular deformation and areal scale plotted against latitude along the meridian at 0°. On Equirectangular the angular deformation reaches 114.2° and the areal factor reaches 11.5. What is taught wrongly

The plate carrée, the projection nobody chooses

Plotting latitude against longitude on ordinary axes is a projection. It preserves nothing, its angular deformation reaches 108° and its areal error eightfold, and it is probably the most widely produced map in the world because it is what happens when nobody decides anything.

All threads