Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Concept

Curvature — where it appears

How sharply a surface bends, measured intrinsically as the product of the two principal curvatures at a point. Gauss's theorem says it can be computed without leaving the surface, so a sphere's cannot be made zero by any map, and that is where the whole impossibility comes from.

Named by 7 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Three distances, two degrees of freedom. The Chamberlin trimetric construction with its three centres marked. A point is placed by intersecting circles of its true distance from each centre — but three circles in a plane do not meet in a point, and the three candidate positions obtained by taking the conditions two at a time are 17.0 km apart at the sample point. They are drawn here magnified 120 times about their own centroid, which is where Chamberlin's rule puts the point. The residual is not an error in the arithmetic; it is the amount by which the sphere refuses to be a plane, and it grows as the cube of the size of the region.

Three conditions are one too many

Two distances fix a point in a plane and a third has no freedom left to be satisfied with. Chamberlin's trimetric construction averages the three positions that satisfy two conditions each, and the spread between them — never zero anywhere, 22 km over North America, growing as the cube of the region — is the price of the extra clause.

choosing · Condition Everywhere Albers is exactly right, and the band round it. The set on which both principal scale factors are one — the only ground where a ruler on this map, at the map's own stated scale, measures the true distance in every direction. It is the parallels at 20.000° and 60.000°, drawn as a curve, with the band within 0.01 of true scale shaded round it. That band is 2.673 per cent of the sphere, and it narrows as ε as the tolerance tightens. The curve at its centre has no width at all, and no tolerance makes it have one.

The places where a map is exactly right

Nine essays on this ladder say a map cannot be right everywhere. None asks where it IS right — and the answer is a curve, a pair of curves, or two isolated places, never a patch. Measured across fourteen projections the set's neighbourhood shrinks with an exponent of 0.48, 1.0 or 2.0, and the value the impossibility forbids is 0.

impossibility · Curvature Where a ridge, a valley and the pass between them curves the other way. The Gaussian curvature of a stated terrain over a 80-kilometre window, with the sign shown by the colour and the size by the ink. Positive on the summits and in the hollows, negative everywhere between — which is most of it: 79 per cent of the curved area. The extremes are 2.2e+4 times the Earth's own curvature, which is the quantity twelve rungs of this ladder have taken to be the curvature of the thing being mapped.

Where the surface curves the other way

Twelve rungs argue the impossibility on surfaces whose curvature is positive everywhere. The surface a map of the ground actually depicts is not one of them: a stated terrain is saddle-shaped over 79 per cent of its curved area, its curvature runs to twenty-two thousand times the Earth's own, and even a single smooth hill is concave over 89 per cent of itself.

impossibility · Curvature The shortest route, and the shortest route a vehicle can fly. A leg of 60 kilometres for a vehicle whose minimum turning radius is 5, arriving on a heading 120° off the line and required to leave on one -60° off it. The straight line is the geodesic; the curve is the shortest curvature-bounded path, which is Dubins's RSR — a turn, a straight, a turn — at 67.29 kilometres against 60. The second curve is the runner-up word, drawn to show that the choice between them is a real one rather than a formality.

The shortest route a vehicle can fly

Nine rungs find the shortest path under a metric and none asks whether the thing travelling can follow it. Bound the curvature and the route depends on two headings as well as two positions: the turning cost is a fixed 1.81 kilometres whatever the leg length, so it is 18 per cent of a short leg and 0.28 per cent of a long one, and the whole of it vanishes when the vehicle happens to be pointing the right way.

paths · Paths The indicatrix is a limit, and here it is being taken. The axis ratio of the image of a circle of radius ρ, measured from the picture rather than computed from the derivatives, against the ratio the derivatives give. It converges, and it converges as ρ² — each halving of the radius quarters the departure. At the smallest radius drawn the two agree to 7.6e-4 relative. This is what "the indicatrix is a limit" means when it is working: there is a number for the ratio to settle on, and it settles.

The indicatrix at a point that has none

Ten essays on this ladder take the derivative for granted. Rung three proved the indicatrix is a limit and every figure since has assumed the limit exists. There are points on the maps this collection draws where it does not, and they are not exotic: the horizon of a gnomonic map, and every corner of every polyhedral net.

distortion · Tissot The part of a request no conformal map can supply — scale falling with distance from the centre. The difference between the requested scale field and the nearest achievable one, over the patch, with the sign shown by colour. The RMS is 1.81e-1 in the logarithm of the scale and the worst single point is 4.91e-1. This is not an error: it is the part of the request that no conformal map of any kind can grant, and its SHAPE is the answer — it says where the request was impossible, which a single number cannot.

The nearest map to an impossible request

Rung seven found that not every distortion can be asked for. It never asked what happens when one is asked for anyway — and the answer has a shape: the achievable fields are the solutions of an elliptic equation, a request is a point off that set, and the nearest point leaves a residual whose floor is the curvature rather than the size of the ask.

choosing · Condition Twenty-four versions of one shape, and not one of them gains area. The same closed boundary rotated twenty-four times and simplified at the same tolerance. If the area error were noise the values would straddle zero and their mean would fall towards it; they do not. Every one is negative, the mean is -0.4644 per cent, and the mean is 71 standard errors from zero. A bias of that size cannot be removed by averaging over more boundaries, which is the only defence anybody has against a rounding error.

A thousand features are wrong in the same direction

The area a simplification costs is unpredictable in sign for one feature. Over a population it is not: twenty-four presentations of one shape all lose area, the mean is seventy standard errors below zero, and no amount of aggregation removes it.

applied · Generalise

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ConformalityConditionConstraintLeast-squaresOptimisationResidualTheorema EgregiumToleranceAggregationAngle deficitAnisotropyArea

All concepts