Cartographic Projection
every map is wrong, and by exactly how much
Theme

The thread: Measured, not named — page 3

A projection is usually called conformal because that is its name. Here it is called conformal only after the angular deformation has been computed at several hundred points and found to be zero. Essays 49 to 72 of 292.
A triangle of 25.0° excess, drawn on Mercator. The three geodesic sides as curves and the three straight sides a ruler draws, with each vertex labelled by how far the ruler's angle is from the true one. The straight-sided triangle's angles sum to exactly 180° because it lies in a plane, and the real one's sum to 205.02°, so the three errors have to account for the whole 25.02° of spherical excess between them — and they do so on this conformal projection exactly as they do on any other. What is taught wrongly

Conformal does not mean the angles are right

A conformal projection preserves angles between curves at a point. Draw a triangle on one with a ruler and its angles are wrong by degrees — and the total error is fixed before the projection is chosen, because a plane triangle sums to 180° and the real one does not.

 Three surfaces, and the two heights between them. The ellipsoid, the geoid and the ground, with the two heights a coordinate can carry. Ellipsoidal height h is what a satellite fix returns and is measured from a surface defined by four constants. Orthometric height H is what a level and a staff measure and is referred to the geoid — the equipotential surface that best fits mean sea level. They differ by the separation N, drawn here as 45 metres because that is a stated input rather than a computed one: a geoid model is a data product with a truncation degree in it, and this site computes rather than downloads. The arithmetic h = H + N is exact whatever N is. What the numbers refer to

Height above what?

A satellite reports a height above a mathematical surface. A level and a staff report a height above the surface water settles on. The two disagree by tens of metres, both are correct, and only one of them decides which way a pipe drains.

 Which way Sinusoidal stretches the ground. The major axis of Tissot's indicatrix at 180 points, drawn as a stroke rather than an ellipse because the argument is the orientation. Longer strokes mark more elongated indicatrices. The direction departs from the graticule by up to 44.4°, so the scale "along the meridian" is not the scale along the direction that is actually stretched most. Measuring distortion

Distortion has a direction

Tissot's indicatrix is an ellipse, an ellipse has an orientation, and the orientation is never reported. On most projections it is not along the meridian, on a conformal one it does not exist at all, and both facts are computable from the same four derivatives as everything else.

 The image of a circle on Mercator, against its own indicatrix. A circle of three radii on the ground at 30°, 40°, projected exactly — the solid curve — against the ellipse the indicatrix predicts for it, dashed. The filled dot is the image of the circle's centre and the hollow one is the centre of area of what was actually drawn, which is not the same point. The departure runs from 3.14 per cent at 4° to 15.80 per cent at 16°, so it grows in proportion to the radius rather than to its square: halving the circle halves the relative error and does not quarter it. Measuring distortion

The indicatrix is a limit

Tissot's ellipse describes an infinitesimal circle, and every published one is drawn finite. The error of the description falls as the radius rather than as its square — halving the circle halves the lie — and on the Robinson projection at a table entry it does not fall at all: sixty metres and six kilometres are both 1.17 per cent wrong.

 "Within 0.01°" on the ground, at five latitudes. The same condition drawn at five latitudes, all at one scale. A degree of latitude is a fixed distance — 1106 metres here, varying by less than one per cent from equator to pole — while a degree of longitude collapses as cos φ, from 1113 metres to 289 at 75°. So the "circle" is an ellipse of 3.86:1 there, and it encloses 26 per cent of the ground the same condition covers on the equator. Even on the equator it is not round: M is smaller than N by the flattening, so the shape is 6694 parts per million shorter north–south than east–west. What a machine does with it

A degree is not a unit of length

"Within 0.01 degrees" is a condition anybody can write and no instrument can measure. On the ground it is an ellipse — 1,106 metres north–south and 558 east–west at 60° — and even on the equator it is not a circle, because the meridian's radius of curvature is smaller than the parallel's by the flattening.

 How much curvature varies from place to place, body by body. The Gaussian curvature along a meridian, each body against its own smallest value, so the curves are comparable. Written from the bodies actually drawn: Earth varies by 1.0135, Mars varies by 1.0239, Vesta varies by 2.71, Phobos varies by 4.16, from the flattest place on each to the sharpest. A surface of constant curvature is a sphere and nothing else is, so the impossibility argument this field is built on has a local version on every real body: how flat a patch is depends on where the patch is. The impossibility

Curvature that varies from place to place

The impossibility this site is built on was argued on a sphere, where the curvature is one number. On the Earth it varies by 1.35 per cent, on Jupiter by 31, on Vesta by a factor of 2.7 — and on a body with three axes it varies along a parallel, which no formula in latitude can express.

 Four ways to build the same equal-area projection. The cylindrical equal-area projection's own areal scale factor, measured from its Jacobian against the metric of the body it is drawn for. On a sphere with the spherical formula it is one everywhere, which is the control. Feed the same formula the geodetic latitude a coordinate actually carries and measure against the ellipsoid it refers to, and it is 1.00674 on the equator and 0.99332 at 88° — a spread of 1.34 per cent, on a projection whose entire purpose is that there is no spread. Rescaling to make the totals agree does not repair it. The authalic northing q/2 does, exactly. What is taught wrongly

Equal-area on the wrong body

The site's headline is that Web Mercator puts geodetic latitudes into a spherical conformal formula and stops being conformal. The same sentence is true with "equal-area" in it and nobody says it: the areal factor is 1.00674 at the equator, 0.99332 at 88°, and averages to almost exactly one — so every check that adds up areas passes while every cell is wrong.

 Normal gravity, derived from four constants. Gravity on the surface of the level ellipsoid, by Somigliana's closed form, for WGS84. Nothing here is measured: a, f, GM and ω go in and the whole curve comes out, rising 5186 milligal — 0.53 per cent — from equator to pole. The two open marks are the published values of equatorial and polar gravity for WGS84, which the derivation reproduces to ten significant figures rather than borrowing. What the numbers refer to

The ellipsoid is a level surface

WGS84 publishes two dozen constants and defines four of them. The other twenty are consequences — polar gravity, the potential of the ellipsoid, the coefficient that dominates the Earth's gravity field — and every one comes back here from a, f, GM and ω to the last digit published.

 Grid north against true north at 52°, across a 6° zone. seven meridians drawn in the grid's own coordinates. The grid's north is straight up the page everywhere by construction; the meridians are not, and the angle between them is the convergence. It is exactly zero on the central meridian, reaches 2.36° — 142 minutes of arc — at 3° out, and changes sign across the middle. The manual's γ = Δλ sin φ is 3.0″ short of it at the zone edge. The families

Grid north is not north

A grid has one north, parallel everywhere on the sheet by construction. The Earth has a different one at every point. The angle between them reaches two degrees at the edge of a UTM zone, and a straight line on the grid is not a straight line on the ground either.

 The shortest route and the quickest one, in a zonal jet. A craft making 20 km/h through the medium, from 40° north, 34° west to 52° north, 6° east. The great circle is 3313 km and takes 111.6 hours in this flow; the quickest track is 169 km longer — 5.1 per cent further — and takes 99.1 hours, saving 11.2 per cent of the time. The strokes are the flow at its own scale, and the whole difference is that the track bends into the helping part of it. Drawn in Lambert conformal conic. Paths and directions

The quickest route is not the shortest

Every route on this site so far is in a medium that does nothing, so length and time are the same question divided by a constant. Once the water moves, they are different questions with different answers: the quickest track sails five per cent further and arrives eleven per cent sooner, and the journey back takes four times as long as the journey out.

 Where two equal geodesics meet, from 15° north. A geodesic leaving at azimuth α and its mirror image at −α have the same length wherever they meet, and by symmetry they meet on the antipodal meridian. On a sphere they all meet at one point, the antipode, to 1.4e-7° — the flat line. On the ellipsoid the meeting latitude moves with the azimuth, from -15.563° to -15.009°, so the set of points with two shortest routes is an arc 61 km long, and the distance to it varies by 31 km along its own length. Paths and directions

Where the shortest route stops being the only one

On a sphere there is exactly one point with no shortest route from a given place: the antipode. On the ellipsoid the Earth actually is, that point is an arc — sixty-six kilometres of the antipodal meridian for a point on the equator, half a kilometre for one at 85°, and every point of it reachable by two different geodesics of exactly equal length.

 The area of one 20° × 10° cell at 50–60° north, seven ways. The cell has an exact area — R²Δλ(sin φ₂ − sin φ₁), 1,416,580 square kilometres — so every other row is a measurement of the method rather than of the ground. The equal-area projection returns it to 1.000000 and the spherical polygon formula to 1.000000, which is three routes agreeing — and the same cell integrated on the ELLIPSOID comes out 0.45 per cent away from all three, because the sphere is a model. Taking the shoelace in Mercator gives 3.06 times too much, and treating degrees as a length gives 1.75 times — about sec φ at the cell's middle, which is where that error comes from. What a machine does with it

Computing an area needs a surface

A shoelace over a ring of coordinates returns a number whatever the coordinates are. For one twenty-by-ten-degree cell it returns 1.75 times the true area in degrees, 3.06 in a conformal plane, and exactly the closed form in an equal-area one — and the closed form itself is 0.45 per cent out, because the sphere is a model too.

 A great circle and the ruled line, on Mercator. The shorter of the two routes is the curved one. The great circle between the two marked points is drawn against the straight line a ruler would give between them on Mercator; over 70° of arc the curve departs from the ruled line by 11.9 per cent of the chord. The flexion at the midpoint, which is the rate the image turns per radian of arc, is 0.788; the angular deformation there is 0.00°. Measuring distortion

Tissot stops at the first derivative

Every quantity this site has measured is read off one derivative of the projection. A map can be conformal at a point — the indicatrix a circle, the angular deformation zero to eleven figures — and still bend every geodesic through it, at a rate of 0.839 radians of turning per radian of arc.

 Why a levelled height is not a distance. The correction between raw levelling and orthometric height, for lines at 200, 500, 1000, 2000 metres above the geoid running north from 50°. It is not instrument error: level surfaces converge towards the pole, so a run that stays on one of them gains height relative to another. A line 2000 metres up reaches 647 millimetres over 400 kilometres. The dashed line is 10 millimetres, which is about what a first-order levelling network closes to over that distance — so this is not a refinement, it is the larger of the two numbers. What the numbers refer to

A levelled height is not a distance

Level surfaces converge towards the poles by five metres in a thousand, so a chain of perfectly executed levelling observations does not sum to a height difference. The correction over four hundred kilometres of northing is larger than the network's own closure.

 Three curves between 45°N and 55°N, 3026 km apart. The normal section observed from the first point, the normal section observed from the second, and the geodesic, each plotted as its distance to one side of the great-circle chord between the two ends. The two sections are 79.0 metres apart at their widest and the geodesic runs between them, 53.3 metres from the first. In LENGTH they differ by almost nothing — 2.40 millimetres over 3026 kilometres — so an observation that follows the wrong one measures the right distance along the wrong ground. On a sphere all three coincide exactly. What is taught wrongly

The normal section is not the geodesic

A theodolite at A sighted on B swings in one plane and the instrument at B sighted back swings in another, so the two observations trace different curves on the ground — 79 metres apart over 3,026 kilometres — and the shortest path is neither of them. The lengths differ by 2.4 millimetres, so the wrong curve measures the right distance along the wrong ground.

 Exact distances from two places, and from nowhere else. The two-point equidistant projection with London and Cape Town as its centres, 87.0° apart. The light circles are drawn in the map at radii of 30°, 60°, 90°, 120° about each centre; every one of them is a true distance circle on the sphere, to 1.8e-14 relative. Between two points that are not centres the drawn distance is wrong by up to 633 per cent. What each projection optimises

A projection written as a condition

Instead of a formula, a sentence: the distance from these two places must be exactly right. The map that satisfies it is found by intersecting two circles, it is exact to five parts in a hundred million million, and it exists over the whole sphere for a reason that belongs to the sphere rather than to the construction.

 The azimuthal family, as one function of one variable. Every azimuthal projection is a rule for how far from the centre to draw a point at angular distance ρ, and nothing else. five named projections are plotted as their radial functions — tan ρ, 2 tan(ρ/2), ρ, 2 sin(ρ/2), sin ρ — and the two dashed curves are the solutions of the two conditions, integrated from the centre with no more than "true scale at the centre" to start from. They land on the stereographic and the Lambert azimuthal to 8e-10. The names are the answers to the equations, not descriptions of viewpoints. The families

The azimuthal family is one function

Five azimuthal projections are taught as five viewpoints — from the centre, from the far pole, from infinity. They are one projection with five choices of how far out to draw a point at angular distance ρ, and each named property is a differential equation in that one function: f′ = f/sin ρ integrates to the stereographic projection and f f′ = sin ρ to Lambert's, from nothing but true scale at the centre.

 The taught rule against the measurement, on 30 regions. Each cell is a region built to order — a box of the stated height and width-to-height ratio, centred at the stated latitude — with the family that actually scores best over it, and whether that is what the rule says. Every family is given its own parameters for the region: the conic its cone constant, the cylindrical its standard parallel and the choice of a normal or transverse axis, the azimuthal its centre. The rule is right on 19 of 30, and where it is wrong it is wrong in one direction: it keys on latitude, and what decides the answer is shape. What is taught wrongly

The rule of thumb, scored

Cylindrical near the equator, conic in the middle latitudes, azimuthal at the poles. It is the most repeated piece of practical advice in cartography and it has never been run against a population of regions. Run against thirty, it is right nineteen times, and every one of its failures has the same shape.

 One length, three corrugations. A straight segment shortened by a factor of 0.9, then wiggled across its own direction until its length is back to what it was. The wiggle's amplitude is what buys the length and the number of wiggles is free, so all three curves have exactly the target length while the third stays 16 times closer to the shortened segment than the first. That is the mechanism: the family converges to a map that is not isometric, while every member of it is. The impossibility

Impossible in two derivatives, possible in one

The impossibility this whole collection rests on computes a second derivative, so it is a statement about maps that have two. Take one away and it is false: a corrugation restores an exact length while converging to the map that does not, and iterating it gives a flattening whose derivative converges and whose curvature runs to half a million.

 Six projections, at 40° north. Flexion (solid) and skewness (light) against direction of travel, drawn about a zero circle at one point of each projection. The three conformal ones have curves of exactly equal size, offset by exactly 90°, because on a conformal map both quantities are components of one vector — the gradient of the log of the scale. The others have neither property: ratios run from 0.72 to 2.72. Measuring distortion

Bending and stretching are one failure

The ladder was written expecting flexion and skewness to be two independent ways for a map to be wrong. On a conformal projection they are not independent at all: the two extremes are the same size to four figures and sit exactly ninety degrees apart, because both are components of a single vector.

 A deflection of 10 arcseconds, and what it hides. The ellipsoid normal and the plumb line at one point, with the geoid tilted against the ellipsoid by 10 arcseconds — drawn 3000× steeper than life, because at true scale the two lines are indistinguishable. The relation is exact and linear: an arcsecond of deflection is the geoid rising 4.85 millimetres in a kilometre, so 10 arcseconds is 48.5 millimetres per kilometre. A star sight measures the plumb line's direction, so astronomic latitude differs from geodetic by exactly this angle — 309 metres of ground, at a point where the coordinate itself is correct. What the numbers refer to

The plumb line is not the normal

A latitude measured from the stars and a latitude that means a position on the ellipsoid are different angles, because a plumb bob hangs along gravity and gravity is not perpendicular to a mathematical surface. Ten arcseconds of difference is 309 metres of ground.

 Three distances, two degrees of freedom. The Chamberlin trimetric construction with its three centres marked. A point is placed by intersecting circles of its true distance from each centre — but three circles in a plane do not meet in a point, and the three candidate positions obtained by taking the conditions two at a time are 17.0 km apart at the sample point. They are drawn here magnified 120 times about their own centroid, which is where Chamberlin's rule puts the point. The residual is not an error in the arithmetic; it is the amount by which the sphere refuses to be a plane, and it grows as the cube of the size of the region. What each projection optimises

Three conditions are one too many

Two distances fix a point in a plane and a third has no freedom left to be satisfied with. Chamberlin's trimetric construction averages the three positions that satisfy two conditions each, and the spread between them — never zero anywhere, 22 km over North America, growing as the cube of the region — is the price of the extra clause.

 The icosahedron's faces, drawn on the sphere. The edges of the icosahedron projected radially onto the sphere, which is the partition of the world a polyhedral map uses: everything inside one spherical polygon is drawn on one flat face. Each face spans 25.8° from its centre to its own boundary, and the gnomonic map onto it reaches 6.6° of angular deformation at the corners. Drawn in an orthographic projection of the embedding, which is a map with its own distortion. The families

The globe on a solid

Cylinder, cone and plane are not the only surfaces a sphere can be laid on. Project it onto a polyhedron and the curvature goes entirely to the corners — π at each of the tetrahedron's four, π/5 at each of the dodecahedron's twenty, and always 4π in total, which is exactly the curvature of the sphere it replaced.

 The route at height does not lie above the route on the ground. London to Tokyo, solved at the surface and again at a stated height, with the two ground tracks compared point for point. At a cruising altitude of eleven kilometres the two part by 11.8 metres; the departure is proportional to the height, at a fitted slope of 0.997. On a sphere the same measurement returns 2.7e-9 metres, because the offset of a sphere is a sphere and the two geodesics coincide exactly. The offset of an ellipsoid is not an ellipsoid, and this is what that costs. Paths and directions

The shortest route is not at sea level

Ten rungs route on a surface and nothing is ever flown on one. The offset of a sphere is a sphere, so at altitude the great circle is the great circle. The offset of an ellipsoid is not an ellipsoid — its radii of curvature are M + h and N + h, which belong to no ellipsoid — so the shortest route at cruising height does not lie above the shortest route on the ground.

All threads